The instrument suite
Capability, benchmarking and maturity review.
Seventeen instruments. Twelve processes. One maturity profile. Each instrument reads a defined part of the framework — the engine processes, the two forces, the foundations — and every reading feeds a single institutional maturity profile. The profile, not negotiation, configures the advisory engagement: every install begins here.
AcademicOS Vitals is licensed to institutions in an AcademicOS advisory relationship. Each instrument opens with a licence username and password. To request access, write to ramesh.bhat@academicos.co.in.
The common scale
The result is not a single number but a profile across the framework: which processes are strong, which are fragile, and which weak process is quietly dragging down the others. Because the engine runs in tandem, the lowest rung often matters more than the average.
Instruments 01–05 · licensed
For the Vice Chancellor, Dean, HoD, or IQAC — the system-level instruments that anchor the maturity profile.
What it measures · Where each quality-assurance process sits on the maturity ladder, from ad hoc to self-improving.
What you receive · A process-by-process maturity reading the leadership team can act on.
What it measures · Assessment, outcome analysis, and BEA closure — the part of the system most often invisible to institutional leadership.
What you receive · A focused reading of the assurance-of-learning loop and where it fails to close.
What it measures · How effectively the school teaches and how well that teaching is supported, across eleven domains of the framework.
What you receive · A termly Dean / HoD-level reading, comparable term on term.
What it measures · A programme-level audit of a Master’s curriculum — outcomes and alignment, market relevance, assessment, structure and OCAC.
What you receive · Fitness bands, a gap register, and recommendations.
What it measures · A course-level audit — CLO↔PLO alignment with a Bloom-verb helper, credits and workload, sequencing, assessment and rubrics, pedagogy mix, scholarship, policies, OCAC and coordination.
What you receive · A course-level reading with flagged gaps and fixes.
Instruments 06–13 · licensed
Eight focused instruments across the rest of the engine — each a deeper read of one process the institutional instruments may flag.
Is the same course consistent across sections — named Anchor, shared architecture, common assessment, real-time coordination?
Lead indicators, at-risk identification, timely intervention, mentorship and the loop to action.
Board of Studies, employers, alumni, placements, industry — and the loop back into curriculum.
Climate, output and quality, funding, incentives, time, the teaching-research connection.
The FDP system, IFAP, onboarding, teaching and research capability, AI-readiness, recognition.
Integrity culture, plagiarism, integrity-resilient assessment, a task-level AI policy (PAIR), privacy.
Strategy, outcome-attainment evidence, AoL/BEA, documentation, benchmarking, ranking metrics.
Designed-in OCAC across three levels, ownership, tie to KASH, resourcing, student leadership, breadth.
Instruments 14–15 & suite tool · licensed
Private, browser-based readings for the individual teacher, provided to faculty of licensed institutions — plus working tools for designing programme learning objectives and writing Bloom-aligned course outcomes.
A private read of your contribution to the academic processes that turn intentions into learning.
A private read of how strongly you shape what students do and think, across eight zones of influence.
Write course outcomes with the right Bloom verb. It checks each verb, flags vague wording, suggests fixes, and tracks the higher-order share against a ≥ 60% target.
A committee tool for setting programme learning objectives. It gathers institutional, stakeholder, accreditation, KASH and 2028-readiness inputs, then proposes a measurable, tiered PLO set with a coverage map and the ABCD and AI litmus tests.
Instruments 16–17 & companion tools · licensed
Two research-based readings for schools on an international-accreditation path, with a learning-gain companion toolset. They sit alongside the institutional instruments above; the Teaching-Excellence reading is broader than, and complementary to, instrument 03.
What it measures · A research-based reading across ten dimensions of teaching excellence — pedagogy, alignment, assessment, technology, inclusivity, scholarship, work-integrated learning, learning gain, enabling conditions and external validation.
What it measures · A readiness self-audit mapped to the AACSB 2026 Global Standards and the EQUIS chapters — can the school demonstrate teaching effectiveness and learner success to a peer-review team, with a gap register as the output.
A working Excel calculator (normalised gain, effect size, value-added) and a one-page measurement protocol, for schools implementing the system of learning gain.
Access
The seventeen instruments, and the case studies released alongside them, are available to institutions engaged in an AcademicOS advisory relationship. Access is by licence: each institution receives a username and password that opens AcademicOS Vitals for its leaders and faculty for the licence period.
The advisory engagement is what makes the reading useful. A score on its own changes little; paired with advisory support, Vitals turns into a plan an institution can act on, term after term — and the annual re-run shows the maturity profile moving.
Request access
Tell us your institution, your role, and which instruments interest you. We will respond with the advisory options and a licence.
Email ramesh.bhat@academicos.co.in →Already licensed? Open any instrument above and sign in with your licence username and password.